Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01131
Original file (PD2012 01131.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1201131
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130509
SEPARATION DATE: 20030801


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflect that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (11C/Indirect Fire Infantryman) medically separated for chronic right knee pain. The right knee pain began in May 2002 without any specific injury or trauma. He underwent non-surgical therapies without significant improvement in his symptoms, and in January 2003 had a diagnostic arthroscopy with a synovial debridement. He then again was treated conservatively but the right knee could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or to satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee condition, characterized as “chronic right knee pain (patellar tendonitis),” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “chronic right knee pain without any history of trauma/injury” as unfitting, rated 0% citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “My right knee hasn’t improved at all, in fact it has gotten worse over the years since the injury. It always feel like it going to blow out at anytime. This condition I have is a result of my flat feet that doctors done nothing about when I was road marching in basic training.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The requested flat foot condition was not identified by the MEB/PEB, and thus is not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB (Dated 20030613)
 VA (~1 month post-separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Right Patellar Tendonitis 5259 10%* 20030731
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 4 20030731
Rating: 0%
 Rating: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 30828 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ); revised to code 5024 in VARD dated 20050503 with same 10% rating.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code).

Right Knee Condition. The CI first began having right knee pain during basic training in May of 2002, without any specific trauma, or associated mechanical symptoms. He was initially treated with physical therapy, activity modification, and medications, without success. Given failed conservative therapy, the CI underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy in January 2003, with release of a synovial plica (abnormal band of tissue often a cause of knee pain). There were no significant anatomic findings noted during the arthroscopy. The CI’s pain worsened post-operatively, and again did not respond to multi-modality treatment. He also began to complain of night-time discomfort, and was unable to run, walk substantial distances, or perform other MOS required tasks. The CI’s right knee condition was consequently referred to the MEB. The findings of the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination dated 30 April 2003, approximately 3 months prior to separation, are shown in the range-of-motion (ROM) table below. Knee radiographs performed in September 2002 were unremarkable. Two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the right knee, in October 2002 and in May 2003, were also essentially unremarkable, except for evidence of slight degenerative changes in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, and thickening of the lateral aspect of the patellar tendon on the later MRI, consistent with patellar tendonitis or post-operative inflammation. The NARSUM established a diagnosis of patellar tendonitis, associated with chronic “over-use”. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed a day prior to separation, the CI reported ongoing right knee pain. Examination findings are noted in the ROM table below. In short, there was no evidence of any abnormal findings except tenderness around the patella, both at rest and during knee extension. Another VA examination was reviewed by the Board, dated 23 October 2003, approximately 2 months after date of separation. The CI continued to complain of right knee pain with occasional “flares,” weakness and instability. Again, there were no mechanical findings on evaluation, and the ROM, given in the table below, remained normal. The goniometric ROM determinations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized as follows:

Right Knee ROM
(Degrees)
MEB/Ortho
~ 3 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20030430)
VA C&P
~ 1 day Pre-Sep
(20030731)

VA C&P
~ 2 ½ Mo. Post -Sep
 (20031023 )
Flexion (140 Normal)
 155 140 140
Extension (0 Normal)
 0 0 0
Comment
 Tenderness
P ain with McMurray’s maneuver
No instability 		Tenderness
Negative McMurray
No instability 		Tenderness
Negative McMurray
No instability
§4.71a Rating
 0% 0% 0%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the knee condition 0% under the analogous 5003 code (degenerative arthritis). The PEB’s DA Form 199 reflected “chronic right knee pain” and “patellar tendonitis,” with “full ranges of motion without any ligamentous laxity;” the PEB applied rating criteria for single joint involvement with non-compensable ROM to arrive at its 0% rating under the 5003 code. The VA rated the knee condition 10% under code 5259, removal of semilunar cartilage, symptomatic. There was no limitation of motion or ligamentous instability for rating under the respective codes (5260, 5261, 5257). The CI did not have a meniscus removed during surgery and there was no dislocated meniscus for rating under the related diagnostic codes. The Board discussed whether there was sufficient evidence to support a 10% rating under provisions for painful motion (§4.59) and functional loss (§4.40). All members agreed the functional limitations supported a 10% rating. The Board concluded that there was no route to a rating higher than 10% under any applicable code and no coexistent pathology which would merit additional rating for the knee pain condition under a separate code. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the CI’s right knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5024 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Right Knee Condition 5099-5024 10%
RATING
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120605, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130011449 (PD201201131)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00433

    Original file (PD-2012-00433.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB referenced a visit to orthopedic surgery in December 2008, 8 months prior to separation, which diagnosed patellofemoral dysfunction and recommended medically separating the member if she did not improve with quadriceps rehabilitation at physical therapy (PT). The VA 40% rating indicated a significantly more limited extension based on the C&P exam interpretation of ‐30 degrees limited extension. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00065

    Original file (PD2012-00065.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The other requested conditions (the remaining conditions rated by the VA at separation) are not within the Board’s purview. *** VARD 20091015 awarded a temporary 100% rating based on surgical or other treatment necessitating convalescence, effective 20090916 to 20100101. The MEB examination performed 5 months prior to separation indicated chronic left knee swelling and tenderness.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00023

    Original file (PD2010-00023.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)0-130⁰120⁰ (pain at 105⁰)Extension (0⁰ normal)-2⁰0⁰CommentPatellofemoral crepitusTenderness over knee medial worse than lateral; Positive patellar compression test§4.71a Rating10%10%At the time of the MEB exam on 2 November 2002, seven months prior to separation, the CI had severe left anterior knee pain which limited his activities of daily living. Negative testing included the McMurray test and tests for ligamentous instability; no effusion was noted and gait was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02496

    Original file (PD-2013-02496.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : “I have continued pain in my knee and cannot do full physical activity as desired. At the time of the MEB NARSUM on 11 March 2004, he denied significant relief of symptoms and complained of pain with kneeling, squatting, prolonged sitting, standing and climbing ladders. The limitation of motion documented in examinations did not attain a minimum rating under the VASRD diagnostic codes for limitation of flexion (5260) or extension (5261).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00858

    Original file (PD2012-00858.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions forwarded to the PEB were left knee medial meniscus tear and left knee patellar chondromalacia. The PEB adjudicated the left knee condition as not unfitting and recommended the CI was “Fit to Continue on Active Duty.” The CI requested a Records Review Panel reconsideration of his case and filed a 2 page statement outlining why “the findings are not compatible with the evidence provided and the condition I currently have.” The Records Review Panel agreed with the CI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00344

    Original file (PD-2014-00344.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20060405 Left Knee Condition . By the time of separation, the CI’s condition had improved such that he had a full ROM, albeit that knee pain persisted in spite of treatment.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00776

    Original file (PD2011-00776.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic pain, right knee without significant instability condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). While the DES considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a service member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00926

    Original file (PD 2012 00926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the right knee condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the chronic right knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5099-5258 IAW VASRD §4.71a. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00688

    Original file (PD2012-00688.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the knee condition as 5099‐5003 at 10% for pain “rated as slight /constant.” The VA rated 10% under 5010 for painful motion and tenderness. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXX), 2900...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00504

    Original file (PD2011-00504.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was rated on one knee condition at 10%. Both knees R and L have laxity was not rated on both conditions. In the matter of the right and left knee condition (anterior patellofemoral pain), the Board unanimously recommends a separate disability rating of 10% for each knee, coded 5299-5260 IAW VASRD §4.71a.